![]() |
||
|
|||
|---|---|---|---|
Teaching and Learning |
EAL learning and teaching in Religious EducationThis guidance is based on my experience of working with secondary school (11-16) Religious Education. The challenges of secondary Religious Education affect all stages of EAL learners. Good general guidance is given in the DfES (2002) booklet ‘Access and engagement’. This article aims to build on that to enable ‘analysis of the language demands’ of the subject and give some directions for development of learning activities that provide cognitive challenge as well as language support in order to make effective provision for EAL learners. QTS Standards
Many EAL learners come from families where a religious tradition, whether Muslim, Christian or Hindu, is highly valued. This should mean that they also bring to RE plenty of personal experience of a faith tradition on which they may build a more academic understanding of their own and others beliefs and experiences. Creation of a classroom that recognises through display and openness to their backgrounds and experiences is therefore an important starting point. It is important to note at this point that Religious education should include experiences of faith that the learners can recognise as similar to their own. Janet King et al’s (2001) ‘Global Perspectives on Christianity’ can be a useful resource to assist in this. However the study of Religious Education also demands thinking processes and skills that are not necessarily part of a child’s religious heritage. This may especially be the case in traditional approaches to faith where religious texts are primarily to be recited or retold rather than applied or interpreted. However research suggests these literacies have their benefits in the development of a child’s linguistic skills. Learning English within RE Learning within RE has several content strands to it including: - Religious account and interpretation. I shall briefly outline ways that Religious Education Teachers can enable EAL learners to develop their use of English as they develop their knowledge and understanding of the subject. Underpinning much Religious Education are religious stories or accounts. These may tell learners about recent believers’ lives or may be drawn from the texts that are part of the religious tradition. Typical features of this sort of writing will be a past tense narrative, using expressions to show passing of time. It may sometimes be academically appropriate to use the present simple narrative – as used in literary recounts and blurbs – particularly when only referring to a part of a story. This sort of storytelling may also be useful to make stories more accessible to early stage EAL learners when accompanied by illustration and careful use of vocabulary. As part of the interpretation of these accounts learners need to express moral values. The language of expression of moral values often uses modals (must, have to, should, ought to, It is right to...) which are more commonly the language of behaviour in school rather than required for writing. So this needs attention drawn to it, and opportunity made for explicit teaching of some of the differences between them. Religious place, practice and ceremony Ethical and theological beliefs and teachings A reminder of the language challenges of good Religious Education can be found in the descriptor of Level 5: Attainment target 1 in the QCA’s ‘National framework for Religious Education’: -
There is then a need both to develop subject specific vocabulary and to develop writing skills to makes causal links between believers’ ideas and actions. They also need to develop their ability to comment on and explain similarities and differences. Other tasks involve evaluation of beliefs The Religious Education classroom can be made a lot more EAL – friendly by ensuring that it is rich in visual support. This will include objects, posters and photographs that invite questions. It may be appropriate to have some key words displayed in a variety of the major languages in the school as well as English. Introducing specialist vocabulary Whether in spoken or written English Religious Education has a large and new vocabulary required by its content. It also uses a lot of general vocabulary that may be of an unfamiliar register or completely unknown to EAL learners. The practice of putting up key words for learners to see and learn is better practice if they are displayed on card throughout a unit of work rather than only on a board lesson by lesson. Ensuring that the new words get reviewed and spoken by students regularly is also a necessary part of learning them. Apart from explaining the words – which may be quicker but gives less time to focus on the explanation– it can be useful to make available suitable dictionaries – including bilingual dictionaries and dictionaries designed for learners of English as a second or foreign language - to look them up. It can also be useful to use online dictionaries of this kind such as the Cambridge Advanced Learner’s dictionary At the end of a unit it is helpful as a starter to use a card matching activity that reviews the new vocabulary covered – especially if you want to see it used in written work for assessment. Listening and Speaking Reading Foundation or Essential Some people feel they are closest to God outside when they have all God’s creation around them. Some services are held in the open air. Jesus would have done most of his teaching outside. Here there are firstly specifically religious terms – worship (as a verb), creation and services. Then there are the challenges of grammatical language: the text uses the phrase ‘That Means that’ to introduce an implication for action rather than to explain the meaning of ‘God is everywhere’. The more tentative, though possibly confusing ‘would have done’ is used rather than ‘did’. The use of the superlative form ‘closest’ may also challenge a weaker reader. Finally a less common meaning is given to a common word. Here, there is the use of ‘are held’ to mean ‘are done’ or ‘happen’. Core In this edition the basic concepts are the same, but the difficulty is increased by the use of one paragraph rather than breaking the ideas into three paragraphs. In addition to the issues I raised with the first text. Sentences are longer, using the linking word ‘so’ and in a subsequent sentence a series of phrases to evoke the beauty of nature. The use of a wider general vocabulary, (in bold above) is for effect and illustration. There is again the use of a word in a less common sense. ‘Move’, which in my dictionary has ten meanings, is used to mean ‘to cause someone to have strong feelings’. However, I would advise the supported use of the second text in a mixed ability class. The second text takes the reader into a world of shared, visually supportable experiences in a way that the first does not. You could use a PowerPoint slide with three appropriate pictures and reference to an illustration of smaller group worship outdoors ( the text shows a crowd at a service welcoming the Pope). This text also gives an example of ways of writing ideas in RE. A further issue is that the text written for greater accessibility also reduces cognitive challenge. The harder text activity section asks,”Why do some people like to worship outside?” as the first of several questions seeking explanation of religious practices. In contrast the easier text offers two gap filling tasks involving selection of words from the text. It only then offers a good overview task “How does a Christian choose a place to worship in?” To achieve a longer, more thoughtful answer would, however, need scaffolding not provided by the text.
The processes labelled DARTS are a useful way to enable access to texts in Religious education as in any subject demanding use of extended texts. The use of first or community language texts may also be helpful – both to affirm the value of the languages spoken in the classroom and to enable mother tongue literate students to understand the religious text better. Religious texts are widely available in translation. See the note below for further details. Writing A concern for many Religious Education teachers is the lack of time to create space for extended writing as well as teaching content. The tendency is to try to achieve more in terms of knowledge of content than a learner is able to respond to intellectually and learn from reflectively. Use of writing frames as found in Wray and Lewis (1996) and (1998) as well as Bazeley (2002) to support extended writing can support and speed the process of developing the writing skills required. This is especially the case for writing that requires more than a sequence of time. Writing frames are best used initially to model the writing style –demonstrating writing on the whiteboard using an OHP or electronic whiteboard. They can then be steadily withdrawn as learners start to internalise the requirements of the genre of writing. You will often find that they are often not usable ‘off the peg’ – or need careful selection to choose the right sort. However, at least one exam board (OCR) uses a standardised form of exam and coursework questioning. For more extended writing in coursework an example of a specific rather than generic frame is available to download in the NALDIC Vignettes section.
Translations of the Qur'an into several languages can be found, for example, at http://www.theholyquran.org/. I have not been able to find a good source of paper copies of these. A more modern English version of the Qur'an is in the process of being posted at http://www.anova.org/sev/htm/qr/. Other interpretations are deliberately archaic in style as a way of communicating the style of the Classical Arabic.
ReferencesAnon, (2005) Cambridge Advanced Learners Dictionary (2nd edition): Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Ahluwalia, L , (2003) Christian Perspectives:Foundation Edition; London Hodder Murray Anderson, J. and Maddox, (2004), The Lion Graphic Bible Oxford: Lion Hudson Plc Bazeley, L. (2002) Expressways: Developing Oral and Literacy Skills in Religious Education: Norwich: Religious and Moral Education Press: BLSS : Portsmouth: D.A.R.T.S - Directed Activities Related to Texts DfES (2002) ‘Access and engagement’ London: DFES , 0658/2002 King J, Cooling M, Cooling T, Stanley, B. ( 2001) Global Perspectives on Christianity: Norwich: Religious and Moral Education Press: Lewis M and, Wray D, (1996) Writing frames: Reading: NCLL Lewis M and, Wray D, 1998: Writing across the curriculum; Frames to support learning: Reading: NCLL NALDIC (2005) Research : Bilingualism: Retrieved 14th February 2006 from NALDIC (2005) The Distinctiveness of EAL Pedagogy QCA (2004) A national framework for Religious Education London: QCA, QCA/04/1336 Read G. (1987) How Do I Teach Religious Education? (The Westhill Project): London: Nelson Thornes Taylor I. (1999) Foundations in RE – Christianity: London: Nelson Thornes: Contributing AuthorLuke Bazeley
|
||
Copyright NALDIC 2008
|
|---|